QUESTION 6 (If [categotisation of states into superpowers, great powers, middle powers and small states is] no[t relevant], specify why?)
*original style and language preserved*

Though are still categorization to define what status a particular holds however the criteria are blurring. It is because even the middle powers, small powers or micro-states whether they are able to or not wants to remain independent and take autonomous decisions, desire nuclear arsenals in name of security (it is different matter that they are not able to possess).

Корпорации на глобальном уровне и отдельные игроки влияют на регионы и страны, в том числе и сверхдержавы в прошлой их классификации. Глобальные игроки законспирировались под сверхдержавы

Yes, but mainly because this is a dominant perception; it doesn't say much about actual power.

It distorts the understanding of states' policies and their capabilities

The borders are blurring, and countries are developing faster.

In flux...and non-state dimensions burgeoning??